← Back to Elevance case study Maya artifact 02 of 04

Elevance Health · Maya Project

Research plan

Research goals, methods, participant plan, and phased execution for validating the Maya remote post-operative care experience with partner hospitals.

Project
Maya (Elevance + Lurie Children’s Hospital)
Lead
Jeremy Abrams (primary)
Support
Vaaibhav (secondary)
Status
Historical reference

Goals

Discover

  • Typical clinician workflows
  • How hospitals assist patients who cannot reach their doctor
  • Touchpoints between clinicians, administrators, and patients
  • Communication barriers that must be overcome
  • Demographic makeup of patients, including common devices and technical constraints

Validate

  • Typical reasons for patient readmissions
  • Patient and clinician personas
  • User journey maps and task flows
  • Efficacy of Maya UI and requirements

Deliver

  • Validated high-fidelity interfaces for care teams and the patient pilot experience
  • Refined personas and journey maps for each persona
  • Feature adjustments needed for pilot success

Success metrics

  • Decrease in hospital readmissions of monitored post-op pediatric patients
  • Lowered cost of care per monitored patient
  • Increase in reported guardian and patient satisfaction

Methodology

  • Virtual / field observation at partner hospitals to identify task flows, clinical interactions, and workflow inefficiencies
  • Clinician and patient interviews (in person or remote) to fill gaps after observation
  • Behavioral and attitudinal surveys for objective demographic and behavioral data
  • Usability testing to validate product solutions
  • Diary study during the pilot for experiences patients may forget or hesitate to share in interviews
  • Retrospective interviews after the pilot ends
  • Application analytics (de-identified) to understand production usage

Tools

  • UserZoom for remote interviews and note-taking
  • Tablet for in-person note-taking
  • Recording device for in-person interviews
  • FullStory or equivalent for analytics
  • Dscout or equivalent for diary study
  • Qualtrics or equivalent for surveys

Research participants

  • Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (clinicians, patients, administrators as applicable)
  • Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago (clinicians, patients, administrators as applicable)

Phased plan

Phase 1 — Understand & discovery

  • Virtual observations (2–4 hours per partner hospital; synthesis 4–8 days)
  • One-on-one interviews with 6–10 clinicians, patients, and administrative staff
  • 1–2 short surveys to patients and clinicians
  • Persona refinement from collected data
  • Secondary research (demographic, competitive, and analogous analysis)

Phase 2 — Define & test

  • Visual design: user flows, high-fidelity mockups, clickable prototypes (3–4 weeks initial; ongoing refinement post-launch)
  • Initial usability testing (moderated and/or unmoderated) before and during development

Phase 3 — Release pilot, test & monitor

  • Weekly group interviews with participating clinicians during the pilot
  • Diary study with consenting patients for the duration of care
  • Key interaction metrics tracked with Elevance data partners
  • Ongoing usability testing when new, unvalidated decisions ship

Phase 4 — Retrospective

  • Post-care retrospective interviews with clinicians, administrators, and patients, including satisfaction and NPS-style measures

Hour estimates and burn-rate scenarios for this plan are documented in the project scope and estimates artifact. Clinician discussion guides are in the clinician interview guide.